Google Book Search: fragwürdige Copyright-Regelung

[:de]Nach der ersten Erfolgsmeldung folgt nun die Kritik an der Vereinbarung von Google mit den US-Autoren. Offenbar hat die Harvard-Universität grosse Bedenken bezüglich des Vertrags, der viele urheberrechtliche Fragen offen lässt. Auch sei das Kostenmodell von Google intransparent und fragwürdig. Entsprechend macht Harvard nicht mit – obschon sie einer der grossen Partner von Google bei der Book Search sind. Allerdings fordert Harvard, dass sich die Online-Publikation auf die älteren Werke beschränkt, die frei von Urheberrechten sind.

Eine entsprechende Meldung hat Lesley Ellen Harris über liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu verbreitet:

from the Harvard Crimson –

“Harvard University Library will not take part in Google’s book scanning project for in-copyright works after finding the terms of its landmark $125 million settlement regarding copyrighted materials unsatisfactory, University officials said yesterday. “Harvard had been one of five academic libraries, along with Stanford, Oxford, Michigan, and the New York Public Library, partner with Google when the book scanning initiative was announced in October 2004. University officials said that Harvard would continue its policy of only allowing Google to scan books whose copyrights have expired. …

“In a letter released to library staff, University Library Director Robert C. Darnton, said that uncertainties in the settlement made it impossible for HUL to participate. “As we understand it, the settlement contains too many potential limitations on access to and use of the books by members of the higher education community and by patrons of public libraries,”Darnton wrote. “The settlement provides no assurance that the prices charged for access will be reasonable,” Darnton added, “especially since the subscription services will have no real competitors [and] the scope of access to the digitized books is in various ways both limited and uncertain.” He also said that the quality of the books may be a cause for concern, as “in many cases will be missing photographs, illustrations and other pictorial works, which will reduce their utility for research and education.”

Lesley Ellen Harris

www.copyrightanswers.blogspot.com[:en]Nach der ersten Erfolgsmeldung folgt nun die Kritik an der Vereinbarung von Google mit den US-Autoren. Offenbar hat die Harvard-Universität grosse Bedenken bezüglich des Vertrags, der viele urheberrechtliche Fragen offen lässt. Auch sei das Kostenmodell von Google intransparent und fragwürdig. Entsprechend macht Harvard nicht mit – obschon sie einer der grossen Partner von Google bei der Book Search sind. Allerdings fordert Harvard, dass sich die Online-Publikation auf die älteren Werke beschränkt, die frei von Urheberrechten sind.

Eine entsprechende Meldung hat Lesley Ellen Harris über liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu verbreitet:

from the Harvard Crimson –

“Harvard University Library will not take part in Google’s book scanning project for in-copyright works after finding the terms of its landmark $125 million settlement regarding copyrighted materials unsatisfactory, University officials said yesterday. “Harvard had been one of five academic libraries, along with Stanford, Oxford, Michigan, and the New York Public Library, partner with Google when the book scanning initiative was announced in October 2004. University officials said that Harvard would continue its policy of only allowing Google to scan books whose copyrights have expired. …

“In a letter released to library staff, University Library Director Robert C. Darnton, said that uncertainties in the settlement made it impossible for HUL to participate. “As we understand it, the settlement contains too many potential limitations on access to and use of the books by members of the higher education community and by patrons of public libraries,”Darnton wrote. “The settlement provides no assurance that the prices charged for access will be reasonable,” Darnton added, “especially since the subscription services will have no real competitors [and] the scope of access to the digitized books is in various ways both limited and uncertain.” He also said that the quality of the books may be a cause for concern, as “in many cases will be missing photographs, illustrations and other pictorial works, which will reduce their utility for research and education.”

Lesley Ellen Harris[:]

Comments
  1. ivermectin for human scabies
  2. cialis 40mg india
  3. tamoxifen and fsh levels
  4. dapoxetine 30mg dose
  5. cialis on internet in us
  6. vidalista for daily use cost
  7. ed drugs online from canada
  8. sildenafil 100mg price at cvs
  9. generic tadalafil 5mg cost
  10. generic viagra for women
  11. low cost cialis
  12. online doctor visit
  13. online doctor visit
  14. cialis soft generic
  15. ivermectin for body lice
  16. prednisone for poison ivy rash
  17. buy hydroxychloroquine uk
  18. emergency car locksmith
  19. mejor préstamo
  20. payday loan
  21. best ed medication
  22. sildenafil no rx
  23. cbd for sale
  24. generic tadalafil
  25. viagra no rx
  26. cialis online
  27. pamelor
  28. cheap venlor
  29. venlafaxine buy
  30. olanzapine generic
  31. zyprexa price
  32. is tadalafil same as cefixime
  33. generic sildenafil
  34. cialis 20 mg price walmart
  35. cialis 20 mg price walmart
  36. tadalafil not working anymore
  37. buy thyroid pain medications
  38. cost cialis daily use
  39. HCV medications
  40. schizophrenia drugs
  41. safe generic viagra sites
  42. safe generic viagra sites
  43. termometr
  44. tadalafil 20 mg prices
  45. buy hydroxychloroquine online
  46. tadalafil 20mg pills
  47. tadalafil 20mg pills
  48. vidalista dosage canada
  49. medicine tadalafil tablets
  50. medicine tadalafil tablets
  51. instagram takipçi satın al
  52. clubhouse takipçi satın al
  53. instagram profilime bakanlar
  54. twitter retweet hilesi
  55. saatlerin anlamı
  56. email 10 menit
  57. finanero
  58. finanero
  59. posamochod
  60. posamochod
  61. posamochod
  62. pg slot
  63. instagram beğeni
  64. pożyczki długoterminowe
  65. Chwilówka bez sprawdzania
  66. payday
  67. loans
  68. chwilówka internetowa
  69. pożyczki bez bik big krd
  70. pożyczka
  71. pożyczka internetowa
  72. pożyczki bez bik
  73. Ulaş Utku Bozdoğan
  74. chwilówka bez bik
  75. pozyczka
  76. pozyczka online
  77. chwilówka dla zadłużonych
  78. provident kontakt
  79. kuki
  80. hapipozyczka.pl
  81. credito por internet
  82. Credito rápido
  83. credito personale
  84. Créditos rápidos
  85. fast loan
  86. installment loan
  87. Préstamos online
  88. cash advance loans
  89. personal loans
  90. creditos online
  91. paydayiiiloans.com
  92. Préstamos rápidos
  93. payday loans
  94. Préstamos personales
  95. crédito inmediato
  96. Crédito rápido
  97. cash advance
  98. payday loans online
  99. mejor Préstamo online
  100. paydayiiiloans.com
  101. personal loan
  102. Prestamo rápido
  103. Préstamo inmediato
  104. efiab
  105. ucbfo
  106. dddae
  107. efbdu
  108. mbddp
  109. 児童ポルノを見る
  110. izlenme al
  111. tiktok beğeni satın al
  112. tiktok takipçi
  113. youtube beğeni al
  114. tiktok izlenme
  115. twitch takipçi al
  116. video izlenme al
  117. canlı yayın izlenme satın al
  118. twitter takipçi
  119. facebook takipçi satın al
  120. facebook beğeni satın al
  121. retweet al
  122. Royalbet
  123. chwilówka online
  124. chwilówki online
  125. chwilówki
  126. chwilówki
  127. chwilówki online
  128. chwilówki
  129. Cami Halisi

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.